top of page

Democrats Thrive by Politics of Personal Destruction?

An Fact-finding Essay by John M Jones III (01/07/19)

In 2015 the washington freebeacon headline was “Pelosi Blames Republicans for ‘Politics of Personal Destruction’ After Scalise Shooting.” the article went one to state that, “It didn't use to be this way. Somewhere in the 90s, Republicans decided on a politics of personal destruction as they went after the Clintons, and that is the provenance of it, and that is what has continued,” Pelosi said.” (1) However, this nancy Pelosi or nanpol, what I un-affectionately call her, must be from an alternate dimension because she is certainly not living in the same world I'm do because I remember things QUITE differently than she does because I was there!

Apparently, she forgot how she, the liberals and their media criminal cohorts despised & personally ridiculed Ronald Reagan for being a second-rate Hollywood actor, too old & mentally unfit, a democrat running as a republican, and totally inexperienced. Even after he won both democrats their attacks during his entire eight-year administration until he died.

She probably also forgot when the LA times wrote this in 2010 about Ronald Reagan: “The best conservatives are always dead; the worst are always alive and influential. When Buckley and Kristol, not to mention Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan, were alive, they were hated and vilified by the same sorts of people who now claim to miss the old gang. The gold standard of the dead is always a cudgel, used to beat back the living.” (2) or this

“Southern politicians used to promise their redneck constituents that they would “keep the n*****s in their place,” and when elected, they proceeded to do just that. It has been reported that after losing an early election to just such a politician, George Wallace vowed never to be “outn*****ed” again. Well, it is clear that Ronald Reagan is not going to be “outcolored” (3) or this

“Ronald Wilson Reagan knows a thousand ways of being sentimental, hypocritical and cheap,” or “Over the past few weeks, while the President has been making an idiot of himself yet again on the issue, the Botha lobby has been fighting back. It has been meeting in the White House itself, in the office of Patrick Buchanan. Buchanan, who tried unsuccessfully to become Ambassador to South Africa after the collapse of his boss Richard Nixon, has been hosting and mobilizing the ultraright and making war on Republican waverers. Attenders of his meetings were drawn from the Heritage Foundation, the Conservative Caucus and the usual bunch of big-mouth, God-bothering fund-raisers,” and much more! (2) Was THIS the politics of personal destruction that nanpol was referring to?

She must have forgot how she, the liberals and their media criminal cohorts attacked Robert Bork by saying this: “Robert Bork’s America is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens’ doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of the Government, and the doors of the Federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is — and is often the only — protector of the individual rights that are the heart of our democracy…”-Ted kennedy, 1984. (4) What was his crime to receive such a lashing? The democrats focused on his ideology, which was conservative not liberal, rather than his judicial qualifications for the job. Sound Familiar? (5) Was THIS the politics of personal destruction that nanpol was referring to?

She possibly forgot how she, the liberals and their media criminal cohorts called Bush Sr and his family nazi collaborators (6) or when the Washington times wrote this about the press coverage of the then president: “When President Bush (SR) was alive and still a threat in politics, he was scorned and ridiculed by the press. He was doddering and out-of-touch. Patrician, they called him. A buffoon who barfed in the lap of the Japanese prime minister during a state dinner. Even in later years, long after Mr. Bush no longer posed any real threat, the press ran with ridiculous stories accusing Mr. Bush of being an iron sides groper. Yes, this would be the same man that the media sided against in 1992. To help elect Bill Clinton.” (7)

Maybe she forgot when Rush Limbaugh remembered this of Bush Sr.: “There were vicious to him, like they are vicious and partisan to every Republican.” (8) He went on to say about the democrats and the media at his funeral that, “And it’s just -- it’s just phony. It’s nothing more than a vehicle for them to continually contrast this made up image that they have of George H.W. Bush. Which, by the way, what they're saying about him now is true, all of the class and all the dignity, all of the sophistication. But they never reported on him this way when he was president.” (8) Was THIS the politics of personal destruction that nanpol was referring to?

She undoubtedly forgot how she, the liberals and their criminal media cohorts brought uncorroborated he said/she said charges of sexual misconduct against Clarence Thomas or when he said of his ordeal, “He said the honor of the nomination had been crushed by 103 days of prying, innuendo, rumors and dirt”…“Enough is enough”…”He said had come to respond to allegations of sex harassment in the workplace, but not “to be further humiliated by this committee or anyone else, or to put my private life on display for prurient interests or other reasons.”…”Thomas said he had dealt with segregation, bigotry and racism, but this is worse than any obstacle or anything else that I have ever faced”…“No job is worth what I have been through, no job, Thomas said. No horror in my life has been so debilitating.” (9) Was THIS the politics of personal destruction that nanpol was referring to?

Perhaps she forgot how she, the liberals and their criminal media cohorts with less than 30 days from an election tried to spike Bush Jr’s POTUS campaign by revealing he committed a misdemeanor dui 24 years ago. (10) That’s 8,760 days in the past for those counting. Not to mention abc news running stories that Bush Jr. knew about and was behind the 9/11 attacks (11) or when liberal progressive hack wrote this about Bush Jr. in 2017, “More than 4,000 American soldiers died. He stocked his cabinet with warmongering neoconservatives far more cunning and apocalyptic in outlook than any of the amateurs who populate Trump’s gang. These were men who dreamed of civilization-annihilating wars and found a president willing to transform their dreams into crackling reality.” (12) Oh but I am sure THIS wasn’t the politics of personal destruction that nanpol was referring to, was it?

Maybe she also forgot these honorable mentions that Mitt Romeny wore weird underwear, was a high school bully, a murderer, a dog abuser, a tax cheat, and a sexist bastard for keeping women he wanted to hire for a job in binders?

I know she has forgot how she & her liberals and their media cohorts from the moment that President Trump announced have viscously and malicously attacked him as a racist, bigot, homophobe, xenophobe, even though THEY themselves where saying this just a few years ago: “We are a nation of immigrants. But we are also a nation of laws. It is wrong and ultimately self-defeating for a nation of immigrants to permit the kind of abuse of our immigration laws we have seen in recent years, and we must do more to stop it. (Bill Clinton, Remarks At State Of The Union, Washington, D.C., 1/24/95)“ (13)

“Real reform means establishing a responsible pathway to earned citizenship -- a path that includes passing a background check, paying taxes and a meaningful penalty, learning English, and going to the back of the line behind the folks trying to come here legally. And real reform means fixing the legal immigration system to cut waiting periods and attract the highly-skilled entrepreneurs and engineers that will help create jobs and grow our economy.” (President Barack Obama, Remarks At State Of The Union, Washington, D.C., 2/12/13)” (13)

"I voted numerous times when I was a senator to spend money to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in, Clinton told an audience at a campaign stop Nov. 9, 2015…And I do think you have to control your borders." (14) It’s interesting that no one is/was calling them racist, bigots, xenophobe then or now for wanting a secured border. Hillary used the word Illegal! Where is the SJW outrage? Surely THIS was the politics of personal destruction that nanpol was referring to, right?

I could fill the pages with more examples, but do I really need to? It is clear to anyone that the democrats truly live for the political destruction. When politicians blatantly lie and accuse others of doing the very disgusting things or acts, that they are doing is the height of hypocrisy. Educated and informed voters should look at tangible things like verifiable facts, voting records, and evident truths when voting not media spin and not lying politicians. American needs to you stand up and STOP the madness now!















9 views1 comment

1 opmerking

J Jones III
J Jones III
27 jan. 2019

Why must we tolerate those whose sole goal is to destroy our country instead of making it great again! We must stop letting dimtards rewrite history our political history, NOW!

bottom of page